<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Vanguard &#187; science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thevanguard.id.au/category/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thevanguard.id.au</link>
	<description>Thoughts of a sarcastically gifted human being</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Moral Confusion</title>
		<link>http://thevanguard.id.au/2009/08/moral-confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://thevanguard.id.au/2009/08/moral-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Vanguard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevanguard.id.au/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kinda on a dodgy 80s movies kick right now. It&#8217;s epic. XD Anyway, just watched Electric Dreams (ZOMG  ), and it got me thinking, because I have a habit of crying when AI computers &#8216;die&#8217;. See: 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), Silent Running (1972), and Electric Dreams (1984) &#8211; yes, I have cried during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kinda on a dodgy 80s movies kick right now. It&#8217;s epic. XD Anyway, just watched <em>Electric Dreams</em> (ZOMG <img src='http://thevanguard.id.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> ), and it got me thinking, because I have a habit of crying when AI computers &#8216;die&#8217;. See: <em>2001: A Space Odyssey</em> (1968), <em>Silent Running</em> (1972), and <em>Electric Dreams</em> (1984) &#8211; yes, I have cried during all three, for HAL, for the three ickle droids, and for Edgar. ;_;</p>
<p>(As an aside, if you haven&#8217;t watched <em>Silent Running</em>, you should &#8211; it&#8217;s&#8230; haunting and incredibly sad. It stays with you. Srsly.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not one who likes writing hard sci-fi. I tend to stick to dystopia. This doesn&#8217;t stop me reading hard sci-fi though, and empathising with these AI computers. And it&#8217;s this ability to empathise with these AI computers that got me wondering what sort of ethics humans will need to adhere to if/when we get to a point in the future where AI computers are widespread.</p>
<p>Why do I say that we&#8217;ll need ethics? They&#8217;re just machines, right?<br />
<span id="more-64"></span><br />
Well, I don&#8217;t see it that way. Humans have a bad tendency to personify. It already happens with current technology. People give their gadgets and computers names, and talk about them as if they had distinct personalities. How attached do you think we&#8217;ll get when computers not only have names, but can talk and interact with us as if they were alive?</p>
<p>Would we consider them alive? What if they can create, independent of human intervention, like Edgar did? Would we respect their claims for ownership of their creations? Or will we claim they are our creations because they&#8217;re just machines and can&#8217;t create?</p>
<p>I wonder if we even have a right to give machines human-like intelligence and them claim total control over them, that we have some sort of right to decide if they live or die, insomuch as computers can live or die. If they are similar to sentient beings, if we kill them, does it become murder? Or would we end up justifying it the way we justify euthanasing animals? Could you argue those computers would have a &#8216;right to life&#8217;?</p>
<p>This is where my own opinions about this get muddled. I honestly can&#8217;t find a position because I can see all the alternatives and options and ideas and none stand out as being &#8216;the right choice&#8217;.</p>
<p>This is especially true for me with the issue of euthanasia. On the one hand, I can sympathise with wanting to end the misery for someone with a terminal illness who wishes to die. However, I can also see it as murder. I also can&#8217;t see why we can justify euthanasing animals as being &#8216;humane&#8217; and &#8216;putting them out of their misery&#8217;, and yet applying the same thing to humans is somehow wrong. It&#8217;s not like the animals can consent to being euthanised. Indeed, there would be some terminal patients who might not be able to consent. There are also patients who do consent and wish to die, and somehow we think we know better than they do in allowing them to live and drawing out their suffering because ending their life is seen as wrong.</p>
<p>I know there&#8217;s a counter argument that, well, animals and people are different, but are they really? Animals feel pain. They get sick. They love us. We look after them. They might not have the same intellectual capabilities or &#8217;sentience&#8217; as we do, but I doubt that means they are mindless robots. There are different forms of intelligence and ways to communicate.</p>
<p>Still, we feel we have guardianship over our pets and animals because we feel they can&#8217;t make decisions for themselves. We have power of attorney for people who can&#8217;t make decisions for themselves. There are people who have &#8216;do not resuscitate&#8217; things. And yet&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. I&#8217;m feeling a little morbid today. I might go get some coffee once this is done and do some assignments instead of procrastinating further. I doubt I&#8217;ve solved anything in this entry, apart from articulate some thoughts on similar yet different issues. I think I had more to say, but the words aren&#8217;t there anymore, so I&#8217;ll save them for later when I can think of more to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevanguard.id.au/2009/08/moral-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Global Warming Swindle?</title>
		<link>http://thevanguard.id.au/2007/07/the-great-global-warming-swindle/</link>
		<comments>http://thevanguard.id.au/2007/07/the-great-global-warming-swindle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Vanguard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevanguard.id.au/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

I’m the first to admit I’m not much of an extremist when it comes to the issue of global warming. I believe we’ve done some sort of damage to the Earth by the very act of living on it. It’s impossible not to impact the Earth somehow by our activities.
I believe that there is some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p>I’m the first to admit I’m not much of an extremist when it comes to the issue of global warming. I believe we’ve done some sort of damage to the Earth by the very act of living on it. It’s impossible not to impact the Earth somehow by our activities.</p>
<p>I believe that there is some warming going on, but I’m not convinced it’s as bad as environmentalists are preaching about. There’s too much politicising and extremism going on — from both sides — that’s getting in the way of the actual facts coming to light. I suppose this is why I’m still mostly a fence-sitter.</p>
<p>Yes, that controversial documentary screened tonight in Australia, with half an hour less content, mind, and a decent discussion on the issues afterwards that meant I had a whole hour of solid Tony Jones pervage, but that’s another matter entirely.<span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p>I was in two minds about it before I watched it. I’d heard about the controversy and having read most of Clive Hamilton’s book Scorched about climate politics in Australia, I admit I was skeptical about Durkin’s credibility. But I tried to watch it with an open mind, because when one closes oneself off to other opinions, one is on the road to fundamentalism and extremism. Harsh words, I know, but that’s how it starts.</p>
<p>I will admit that some of what Durkin says could be plausible. However, it’s a well-crafted opinion piece and makes its message believable. Or at least, it makes it plausible enough to make you think, which is what it did to me.</p>
<p>Now, I won’t discount the impact the sun has on the Earth. It would be stupid to say the sun has no impact on the Earth at all. There would be no life without the sun. Or at least, no life like there is now. However, one can make statistics and graphs say whatever one wants.</p>
<p>I’m intensely skeptical about a lot of things, politics for one. When I read about studies into medical treatments in the paper, I automatically scan for sample size and who might be funding the trials. Five years studying science at uni has taught me a thing or two about being skeptical, which is exactly what Karoly said on the debate tonight. Scientists are trained to be skeptical. I won’t deny that.</p>
<p>Now, I believe we should look after the Earth. It is, after all, the only one we’ve got. So I’m happy to support green energy and wind power and other alternative energy sources, because I do think it’s a good idea to pursue those technologies, especially in Australia. We get a lot of sun in Australia. We should be one of the leaders in solar power technology, and we should have more of it integrated into our grid than we do. Instead, all the innovative alternative energy technologies are being forced overseas because of a lack of funding and investment. This is a travesty. Our future is being primed for nuclear technology and power, on top of oil, gas and coal.</p>
<p>So what happens when the coal runs out? What about when all the oil disappears? So much of our world is dependant on oil and oil-based materials that there would certainly be a crash of massive proportions when the oil runs out. What happens then? What replaces it?</p>
<p>Right now, I’m not sure if oil or climate change is the bigger problem. I’m not sure what will have an effect first. Sure, oil is getting more expensive, and it’s certainly not going to get cheaper. What happens when oil runs out and climate change hit us both at once? The two things that drive and shape our world would combine to bring developed countries to their knees.</p>
<p>Now, I’m no proper climate scientist. My studies have mostly been in biology, so don’t take what I’m saying as absolute truth or even fact. This is just how I see it. There are just too many problems in the world at the moment that identifying one as the most significant is impossible for me. They’re all a problem, from climate change to oil to poverty to war, and none of them have a simple solution.</p>
<p>The time people stop seeing these things as simple issues that can be solved if everyone wears rubber armbands or buys red iPods or whatever needs to end. These issues are not simple. They won’t be solved overnight. The need for Governments to stand up and take action instead of just talking about things is over. The sooner everyone gets that through their thick fucking skulls the better we’ll all be. Governments need to start taking responsibility for the people they govern.</p></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thevanguard.id.au/2007/07/the-great-global-warming-swindle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
